Eating Behaviour and Body Satisfaction in Mediterranean Children: the Role of the Parents
Valdo Ricca^, Francesco Rotella^, Edoardo Mannucci#, Claudia Ravaldi^, Giovanni Castellini^, Francesco Lapi##, Linda Cangioli^, Paolo Martini###, Carlo Faravelli*, °
Identifiers and Pagination:Year: 2010
First Page: 59
Last Page: 65
Publisher ID: CPEMH-6-59
Article History:Received Date: 26/10/2009
Revision Received Date: 14/3/2010
Acceptance Date: 13/5/2010
Electronic publication date: 20/7/2010
Collection year: 2010
open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
Although the prevalence of fully expressed Eating Disorders is rare in young children, childhood eating disturbances are fairly common. Parents can play a facilitating role for the development of overweight and eating problems among their children. The aim of this study is to detect the possible relationships between children’s eating attitudes and behaviour and the parents’ beliefs about eating habits and body shape of their offspring.
This survey was conducted in the area of Arezzo (Italy), on 900 children, aged 7-12, and on their parents/substitute caregivers. The Kids’ Eating Disorder Survey questionnaire, and the CIBUS questionnaire were administered.
A fully expressed Eating Disorder was diagnosed in two kids only. KEDS total score and weight/dissatisfaction subscale score positively correlated with parents’ answers to the following CIBUS’ items (How do you consider the body shape of your son/daughter? How much does your son/daughter eats? Have you ever thought of putting your son/daughter on a diet?). Positive correlations between the children BMI, desired BMI and the aforementioned CIBUS’ items were found.
The prevalence of formal Eating Disorders in children aged 7-12 is low. Children appear to be more preoccupied with their weight than with their body shape. Parents’ beliefs about the offspring’s body shape and eating habits have a relevant impact on children’s eating attitudes and behaviour.
Overweight and Eating Disorders (EDs) are a relevant health problem in Western countries, and their incidence and prevalence in juvenile populations have remarkably increased in the last decades [1, 2, 3, 4].
Although the prevalence of fully expressed Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and Bulimia Nervosa (BN) is as low as 1% in children and young adolescents, AN can occur from the age of 8, whereas BN is very rare under 12 [5, 6, 7]. On the other hand, even if full blown EDs are rare in young children, both weight and body shape concerns and eating disturbances seem to be fairly common . In school-based studies of 8-13 year-old children, a relevant proportion of subjects report dieting and exercising to lose weight; furthermore, a high Body Mass Index (BMI) is associated with size dissatisfaction and attempts to lose weight [9-11]. In particular, young girls show body dissatisfaction to a greater extent than boys, as suggested by several studies [12-15]. Studies on overweight and obese children highlighted EDs symptoms, such as loss of control over eating, dieting, shape and weight concerns and drive for thinness, which could lead to the development of a full syndrome in adolescence or adulthood [16, 17]. These observations suggest that EDs in children may be present with unusual features, so that they often do not fit neatly within a formal psychiatric diagnostic category. According to a recent study, children suffering from EDs are often diagnosed with Eating Disorders not otherwise specified (EDnos), and are less likely to engage in purging behaviours compared with adolescents .
It is well known that the prevention of psychiatric disorders depends on the identification of modifiable causal risk factors. Familial environment can play an important role, facilitating the onset of eating and/or weight disturbances in children [19, 20]. The role of parental beliefs about eating behaviours of their offspring has been investigated as a potentially modifiable risk factor [19-22]. In particular, food restriction has been found to be associated with disinhibition in presence of palatable foods, even after a full meal [23-25], and parents’ encouragement of weight control seem to be related to the children’s dieting and desire to be thinner . Perceived weight-related pressure and mother’s body shame could influence the development of disordered eating patterns, and parents may influence the development of body image by commenting on children’s appearance, or by requiring the child to eat or avoid certain foods, or by encouraging him/her to slim down [27, 28]. Moreover, parental modelling of weight concerns may contribute to body esteem problems in children, and parents’ comments about the body of their children seem to be related to the offspring’s body satisfaction [29-34].
This study is aimed at evaluating eating attitudes and behaviour, body image, and body dissatisfaction in a population of 7-12 year-old children. Furthermore, the parents’ beliefs and concerns about the body and the weight of their children were evaluated, in order to detect possible relationships between the children’s and parents’ variables taken into account. In particular, the study was designed to explore the effect of parents’ beliefs on body shape and eating habits of their offspring on the childrens’ eating attitudes.
MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY
Sample and Study Design
This study was conducted in the town of Arezzo (Tuscany-Italy) and its immediate surroundings. The whole population of this area is about 105,000 inhabitants. The study sample consisted of two groups: a group of 900 children aged 7-12, attending Primary or Secondary school, and the group of their parents or substitutive caregivers. The study design was approved by the Arezzo Health Authority Ethical Board and a permission from the authorities of each school to conduct the study was obtained. Informed consent was obtained from the parents prior to enrolment.
The children were recruited from 10 Primary (two third classes, two forth classes and two fifth classes) and Secondary (two first classes and two second classes) schools of the centre and the immediate surroundings of Arezzo. Schools were selected through a randomized geographic sampling process, in order to obtain a representative sample of the different socio-cultural contexts (urban centre, suburban areas, rural areas) of the area of Arezzo. At the beginning of the study, teachers and parents received a personal letter from the principal investigator (V.R.), inviting them to participate to the study and to attend a meeting, which took place in each school, where they were provided with information about the study aims and procedures. The fact that anonimity was warranted, and that partecipation was voluntary, was also clearly stated during those meetings.
In order to assess the presence/absence of symptoms of disordered eating and possible eating disorders, all children were administered the Italian validated version  of the Kids’ Eating Disorder Survey (KEDS) . The test is reliable and useful in identifying children with EDs as determined by clinical interview, and it was shown to have excellent test-retest validity and reliability as well as good internal consistency in prepubertal children. The range of score for all items is 0-2, and there are 12 items. A score of 0 means that the behaviour is not present, 1 means that it is possibly present, 2 means it is definitely present. The test provides weight dissatisfaction and purging restriction subscales (KWD and KPR, respectively), as well as a total score. Two sample items of KEDS are as follows: “Have you ever thought that you looked fat to other people?”; “Have you ever been afraid to eat because you thought you would gain weight?”. Two of the items do not load on either the weight dissatisfaction or purging/restriction scales but are included in the total KEDS score . Elevated responses to the total KEDS score are defined as scores greater than 16. In order to evaluate the body size dissatisfaction, subjects were asked to indicate their current and desired size using drawings on the KEDS’ child figures. Body size dissatisfaction score was calculated as the difference between current and desired size. A greater absolute value of the score indicates more dissatisfaction with current body size.
All the parents or substitutive caregivers were administered the CIBUS self-reported questionnaire . This questionnaire is composed of 34 items, and is devoted to the investigation of parents’ thoughts and beliefs about their own and their children’s eating behaviours and body shape. It also includes some questions investigating age, educational level, height (meters), and weight (kilograms).
In the present study, only the responses to the items of CIBUS listed in the Appendix were considered.
Children were given the KEDS questionnaire by teachers in their classrooms during school hours. Teachers were invited to avoid to explain questions or suggest answers, so that children were as less influenced as possible. Children were invited to mark questions they couldn’t answer with a question mark. Teachers collected the completed questionnaires and marked them with a letter corresponding to the one signed on parent’s test, so that each family nucleus could be recognized, while anonymity of all participants was warranted.
Subsequently, the CIBUS Questionnaire was provided to the students, who delivered it to their parents. Each child brought home two copies of the questionnaire for parents or substitutive caregivers, and each parent filled in the self-report form on his/her own. Tests were completed during the week-end and collected from school teachers on the subsequent Monday.
Body Mass Index
For each child BMI was calculated on the basis of height (meters) and weight (kilograms), as provided by their general practitioner. Data obtain from the KEDS’ item “desired weight” was used to calculate the desired BMI for each subject.
Statistical analysis was performed by means of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows (release 15.0.0; SPSS, Inc.).
The values of normally distributed variables were expressed as mean ± SD, whereas the values of skewed variables were expressed as median values [quartiles]. Spearman’s correlation analyses, chi-square testing, and independent variables Mann-Witney U tests were performed when appropriate. Multiple linear regression was used for multivariate analysis.
Considering the large number of analyses, in order to limit type 1 error, significance level was set at <0.01.
Of the 900 children invited, 19 (2,1%) did not receive consent from their parents. Among the participating children, 784 (89%) returned the questionnaires to the teachers. Fifteen of these could not be analysed, because more than 20% of answers were missing. Of the remaining 769 subjects, 36 were excluded because parents’ questionnaires had not been completed. The final sample was therefore composed of 733 children, with their parents/substitute caregivers.
Anthropometric and Clinical Features of the Children
|Overall n=769||Male n=363 (47.2%)||Female n=406 (52.8%)||Sig.*|
|Age (yrs)||10 (9-11)||10 (9-11)||10 (9-11)||0.054|
|Height (cm)||145 (138-151)||143 (138-150)||145 (138-152)||0.42|
|Weight (kg)||36 (31-42)||36 (31-42)||36 (30-42)||0.930|
|real BMI||17.8 (16-19.8)||17.6 (16-19.9)||17.8 (16-19.7)||0.892|
|desired BMI||16.8 (15.2-18.3)||17.2 (15.5-18.9)||16.4 (15.1-17.8)||0.004|
|Total score||4 (1-7)||3 (1-7)||4 (1-7)||0.71|
|Body dissatisfaction subscale||2 (0-6)||2 (0-6)||3 (0-6)||0.039|
|Purging/restriction subscale||0 (0-1)||0 (0-1)||0 (0-1)||0.001|
Statistics - Data are expressed as median value (with 25th and 75th percentiles).
(*): Male to female comparison using Mann-Whitney U Test.
Abbreviations - Keds: Kids’ Eating Disorder Survey.
Characteristics of the Parents
|Age||39 (36 - 42)||42 [38 - 45)|
|Weight (Kgs)||58 (54 - 65)||79 [72 - 85)|
|Height (Meters)||1.64 (1.60 - 1.68)||1.77 (1.72 - 1.81)|
|BMI (Kg/m2)||21.7 (20.2 - 24.1)||25.1 (23.6 - 27.1)|
Statistics - Data are expressed as median value (with 25th and 75th percentiles).
Abbreviations- BMI: Body Mass Index.
KEDS Correlations After Adjusting for Children’s Age and BMI
|Keds T||KPR||KWD||Keds T||KPR||KWD|
|Breakfast with son/daughter (Father)||n.s.||n.s||n.s.||n.s.||n.s||n.s.|
|Thoughts about child’s body shape (Father)||n.s.||n.s||n.s.||.18*||n.s||n.s.|
|Thoughts about child’s body shape (Mother)||.18*||n.s.||.21*||.17*||n.s.||.17*|
|Child’s weight importance (Mother)||n.s.||n.s||n.s.||n.s.||n.s||n.s.|
|How much child eats (Father)||n.s||n.s||n.s.||n.s.||n.s||n.s.|
|How much child eats (Mother)||n.s.||n.s||n.s.||.26*||n.s.||.29*|
|Ever thought about a diet for the child (Father)||.27*||n.s.||.26*||.26*||n.s.||.25*|
|Ever thought about a diet for the child (Mother)||.33*||n.s.||.34*||.23*||n.s.||.21*|
Statistics – Multiple linear regression;
* p < 0.01
Abbreviations - KPR=Keds purging/restriction subscale; KWD= Keds weight dissatisfaction subscale; BMI: Body Mass Index; BMId: Body Mass Index desired.
BMId Correlations with CIBUS Items after Adjusting for Age and BMI
|Thoughts about child’s body shape (Father)||n.s.||n.s.|
|Thoughts about child’s body shape (Mother)||.15*||n.s.|
|Importance of child’s weight (Father)||n.s.||n.s.|
|Importance of child’s weight (Mother)||n.s.||n.s.|
|How much child eats (Father)||.14*||.19*|
|How much child eats (Mother)||n.s.||.27*|
|Ever thought about a diet for the child (Father)||.15*||n.s.|
|Ever thought about a diet for the child (Mother)||.17*||n.s.|
Statistics – Multiple linear regression:
* p < 0.01.
Abbreviations – BMI: Body Mass Index; BMId: Body Mass Index desired.
Only two kids scored higher than 16 on KEDS total score. Desired BMI, KEDS body dissatisfaction and Purging/Restriction subscales showed a statistically significant difference between males and females. The same variables were considered to compare kids living in urban areas with kids living in rural areas, in order to detect possible differences between the two socio-economical environments. No differences were found for age, height, weight, actual and desired BMI (data not shown). When considering KEDS scores, only the Purging/Restriction subscale scores were found to be significantly higher in kids living in urban areas ([0; 1] vs [0; 0]; p < 0.001 for males and [0; 1] vs [0; 0]; p=0.007 for females).
The percent difference between real and desired BMI (BMId) was 0 [-5; +15]% and 8 [0; +15]% in males and females, respectively (p=0.001). For both genders, no significant correlation between age and KEDS scores or BMId was observed.
KEDS total scores showed a significant (p<0.01) correlation with children’s BMI in both sexes (r=0.48 and 0.38 in females and males, respectively), whereas KWD was correlated with BMI in females only (r = 0.51). KPR showed a significant (p<0.01) inverse correlation with children’s age both in females (r = -0.29) and males (r = -0.35). In females only, KEDS total and KWD scores were positively correlated with children’s and both parents’ BMI (r = 0.32 and r = 0.31 respectively for fathers; and r = 0.25 and r = 0.25 for mothers). Correlation of KEDS total score, KWD, and KPR with other variables collected from KEDS and CIBUS questionnaires, after adjustment for age and BMI, are summarised in Table 3. In females, the frequency with which the father usually has breakfast with his daughter had a negative correlation with KEDS total score, but this result was not confirmed after adjusting for age and BMI; however mothers’ Item 2 (Thoughts about child’s body shape) and both fathers’ and mothers’ Item 5 (Thoughts of putting child on a diet) maintained their positive correlation with KEDS total score at multivariate analysis. In males, KEDS total score significantly correlated with mothers’ Items 2, 4 (How much child eats) and 5 and fathers’ Items 2 and 5. KWD, in males, maintained a positive correlation after adjusting for age and BMI, with mothers’ Items 2 and 4 and both fathers’ and mothers’ Item 5; in females, the same correlations were confirmed, except for mothers’ Item 4.
Children’s BMId showed a positive correlation with children’s (p < 0.001) and parents’ actual BMI (p < 0.001 for mothers’ and p =0.01 for fathers’), as with KEDS total and KWD scores (p < 0.001) in both sexes, and with KPR scores (p = 0.001) in females only. The results of correlations between BMI and BMId with CIBUS, after adjusting for age and BMI, are summarized in Table 4. BMId showed a significant correlation with mothers’ Item 2 and fathers’ Item 4 and both fathers’ and mothers’ Item 5 in females, and only with fathers’ and mothers’ Item 4, in males.
Few studies have considered eating attitudes and behaviour and body dissatisfaction in a population sample of children living in a Mediterranean country [39, 40]. The present data confirm that, in this area, the prevalence of fully expressed EDs is low, as suggested by the small number of subjects with a KEDS score greater than 16. Despite the relatively low prevalence of relevant disturbances of eating attitudes and behaviour, many children reported a desired body weight considerably lower than their actual weight; this phenomenon was more pronounced in females and, as expected, in overweight children. The difference between desired and actual body weight positively correlated with KEDS total and weight dissatisfaction scores, and the abnormal eating attitudes appear to be more frequent in females than in males. In particular, young girls tend to show a lower desired weight and a greater body dissatisfaction than boys, as already observed [13-15].
Parents’ perception of children’s body shape and eating habits appear to have a relevant impact on children’s eating attitudes and behaviour, as explored by KEDS. Some Authors reported that mothers have a primary role for female attitudes toward dieting and body weight and shape [40-43]. This result, however, could be influenced by the fact that full AN or BN are investigated and diagnosed mainly in mothers of children with disordered eating attitudes [44, 45]. On the other hand, Leung  and Agras , showed that parental (both father’s and mother’s) body and weight preoccupation and pressure to be thin may influence child’s BMI, thus considering parental control as an independent risk factor for EDs. Our results confirm these previous observations, as significant correlations were found for both parents. In particular, those schoolchildren who are perceived by their parents as overeaters have higher mean KEDS total and subscale scores, and a greater difference between actual and desired weight, irrespective of their BMI. Not surprisingly, parents’ thoughts of putting their children on a diet are associated with higher KEDS scores in children. Similarly, the recurrent parents’ thoughts about children’s body shape seem to affect children’s eating attitudes and desired BMI. On the other hand, parents’ preoccupations about children’s weight do not appear to moderate those variables in a relevant manner, after adjusting for real BMI. These results suggest that children’s body shape, rather than their actual weight, could be the main parents’ drive for their children’s thinness, whereas children appear to be more preoccupied with their weight, rather than to their body shape.
Considering the possible protective factors, having breakfast with parents, and in particular with the father, negatively correlates with ED symptoms, as observed in a recent study , although this correlation lost its statistical significance after adjusting for children’s age and actual BMI.
Overall, although it is very difficult to define factors which modulate the transmission between generations of beliefs and behaviours related to eating and body shape, our results confirm that parents’ eating attitudes are connected with eating behaviours of their children. Although some Authors pointed out that the mechanisms for the intergenerational transmission of these behaviours have yet to be established , some studies found that girls’ body dissatisfaction, purging behaviours and drive for thinness are related to higher levels of family history of eating concerns , and that the mother’s drive for thinness is one of the predictors of the development of EDs in offspring .
This study presents some limitations:
- The assessment of the general psychological and psychopathological features of the children and parents was not performed. Therefore, we were unable to detect some possible meaningful correlations between eating and weight problems, and children mental status. For the same reason, the possible correlations between the children’s eating and weight abnormalities, and the parents’ psychopathological features were not studied. Furthermore, self-reported questionnaires were administered by the teachers, instead of trained psychologists. Although the latter could represent a limitation, this procedure ensured that results of the tests were not affected by opinions or diagnostic attempts of health professionals.
- In order to calculate the children’s BMI, we used the height and weight measures as provided by their general practitioner, possibly determining some bias.
- Menarchal status was not assessed in females. However, it should be considered that neither KEDS scores nor desired weight were significantly correlated with age, although the proportion of post-menarchal females can be assumed to increase progressively with age.
- The CIBUS questionnarire is an instrument developed in Italian language, and it has never been translated and validated in othger languages; this makes the results difficult to reproduce in different countries. However, the relationship between parents’ beliefs and children’s eating attitudes is likely to be affected by cultural determinants, which interfere with the generalizability of results.
- Although response rates were very high, some cases were missing because either the children or their parents refused participation. It is possible that those declining participation had different psychological and cultural characteristics and/or eating habits than those enrolled in the study.
Our study suggests that the prevalence of full-blown Eating Disorders is low, and that many children are dissatisfied with their body weight. The parents’ beliefs about the body shape and the eating habits of the children seem to have a relevant impact on their eating attitudes and behaviour. Larger, prospective studies are needed in order to clarify the possible causal role of parents in the development of overweight and eating disorders in their children.
Appendix 1. Items of CIBUS Used for Analysis
Item 1: How many times a week do you have the main meals with your son/daughter ?
- Breakfast 0 1 / 2 3/ 4 5/ 6 7
- Lunch 0 1/ 2 3/ 4 5/ 6 7
- Dinner 0 1/ 2 3/ 4 5/ 6 7
Item 2: How do you consider the body shape of your son/daughter?
- I don’t know
Item 3: How important to you is your son/daughter’s weight?
- Not important
- A little important
- Very important
- l don’t know
Item 4: According to you, your son/daughter eats:
- Too little
- Too much
- I don’t know
Item 5: Have you ever thought of putting your son/daughter on a diet?
- No, never
- Yes, but I didn’t do it
- Yes,I have my son/daughter on a diet that I run by myself
- Yes, I took him/her to a dietician